Please review the site Rules, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy at your convenience. Rules, TOS, Privacy
Get familiar with the reaction system: Introducing the Reaction System

1.5 way sealed bass, top box interchangeable

edited May 19 in DIY

Finally, finally making sawdust.

Going back to a two stacked box build where I can change out the top (broad ranger, coaxial, or mid / tw separates).

I’m now ‘sold’ on sealed woofer(s) so going with a pair of 8in sealed 1.5 way set-up with the .5 rearward facing. Easy enough to incorporate via active, with interchangeable passive top(s).

Top box; while I recently built an ~open back/side Celestion coax, I’m starting with my old friend- an Audio Nirvana Super 6.5. It’s a very solid, cast aluminum framed, broad ranger with excellent extension. So keeping it ‘simple stupid’.

I may down the road try a Markaudio / super tweeter combo (beyma slot or fostex super tweeter) as this image is ‘calling’ me.

kenrhodesSteve_Lee4thtry6thplanetugly_wooferBillet

Comments

  • What is "this" image.

    On the other hand are you doing any timing difference for the rear 0.5? Interested to see the results. Would there be any cardioid benefits?

  • edited May 20

    @ani_101 said:
    What is "this" image.

    On the other hand are you doing any timing difference for the rear 0.5? Interested to see the results. Would there be any cardioid benefits?

    Didn't see a description (just the image). Looks like a fostex FE168EZ, not certain of the ribbon (could be a fountek?), possibly a 12in W.

    Re the 1.5 woofer box, I'll definitely post when I get there. I'm just thinking potential benefit of offsetting forces front-to-back in a bipole configuration, and the .5 being a 4pi radiation pattern in its frequency range, so location indifferent. Not looking to do a cardioid as they will be played as bipoles, however interesting though if ran as dipole one could play with the .5 level, as well as delay.

  • edited May 20

    Woofer is a SS paper Revelator, and tweeter is a Fountek Neo CD1.0. Size comparison looks like the Fostex is a 4 or 5".

    tajanes
  • Luckily you're not going to use that Fostex driver as a full range! I wouldn't even publish that frequency response if I was Fostex. Note the 10 dB/div scale :#

    Steve_Lee
  • @Wolf said:
    Pretty sure it's this one...
    https://www.fostex.jp/en/products/fe108eσ/

    Thanks, I didn't know they had made a 108 version.

  • @PWRRYD said:
    Luckily you're not going to use that Fostex driver as a full range! I wouldn't even publish that frequency response if I was Fostex. Note the 10 dB/div scale :#

    The fe168 is out of production (and yes it would take a few notch filters to straighten it out, if then). I just thought it was an interesting cone design (and didn't know they made a fe108- thx Ben). I'll be using my AudioNirvana's for starters. But in any event the Markaudio's look to be better broad rangers then the fostex, at least vs the fe168

  • @tajanes said:

    @Wolf said:
    Pretty sure it's this one...
    https://www.fostex.jp/en/products/fe108eσ/

    Thanks, I didn't know they had made a 108 version.

    There was a 208 as well.

  • edited May 21

    I’ve got the top vented boxes put together (not yet felted / foam lined). Tuning with vent open ~ 180ish, with a bit of foam ~ 120ish, which should work out just fine as I’m at this juncture targeting 1st O HP in the neighborhood of 180-240Hz.

    I’m going with a black stain / flat topcoat for the bass unit (Baltic birch) which, per a couple of test pieces, lets the wood grain show through a bit through the black.

    I’m looking to stain the top boxes white (with a flat topcoat). Gave it a go and found that white stain doesn’t really do much of anything to the Baltic birch.

    So, I’m thinking maybe I need to mix some white stain or paint directly into the flat topcoat to move this towards white? I want the grain (what there is) to show through similar to the bass unit (so not wanting to just paint white).

    Suggestions from you guys with painting / staining experience would be appreciated.

    jr@mac
  • edited May 21

    If you want white with some woodgrain peeking through, a white wash would do it. That is what I did on my TV stand. I did a roughly 50:50 mix of white primer to water ratio. Brushed on one coat. If you want less white and more grain, you can use more water/less primer. And/or you can also wipe off excess to reduce the white, like you would stain. But I bet you gotta work quick to do that since it dries quickly. Then finish up with water based polyurethane to seal it without turning the white yellow.

    https://diy.midwestaudio.club/discussion/2435/tv-stand/p3

    tajanes
  • Who said water (based) and oil don’t mix?

    Steve_Lee
  • edited June 14

    I finished up the broad-range box; lined, and lightly stuffed the vent (tuned to ~the driver's free air Fs, which will actually be below final Xover frequency with woofers). I'll be placing some white felt in the corners of the baffle.

    Mostly done making sawdust, all pieces cut. I'll just need to trim the top of the woofer box as I flush mounted the binding post (for the broad-range which will sit on top). Instead of making a big form for a router, I found it easer to cut the small square out of a ⅛ inch sheet of BB ply and glue it to the top board. I'll just need to flush trim it. And set-in for the speakON 4pole.



    jr@macrjj456thplanetSteve_Lee4thtry
  • I need to buy a few more clamps !
    Glue up time. Being patient enough to let the glue dry is one of my (many) weaknesses. But I do need to head to ACE for more glue…

    jr@macSteve_Lee6thplanetrjj454thtry
  • edited June 20

    Waiting for coils for the .5 way to come in, I at least was able to get the stands made (~ 4.5 to 5 degrees upward tilt). And ‘borrowing’ from Ugly Woofer, I cut and routed what will be grills for the back facing .5s. Hard to see in the pics, but the backside of the grills were run (vertically) against the table saw guide to create space for the grill cloth when wrapped around and glued (thx Nick).



    jr@macjohnny5jzKornbread4thtrySteve_Lee6thplanetugly_wooferTurn2Tom_Srjj45and 1 other.
  • edited June 24

    Getting close to gluing up the final sides. While not covering all of the interior with absorbing materials, I try to a) get the first reflection areas (more off the sides of the drivers), and b) generally use a few differing materials/ thicknesses. Just a hunch ?

    Also, personal lessons learned- skip the self-adhesive felts. Gluing gives opportunity to move the material around a bit. The first batch of self-adhesive I ordered from Grainger wasn’t bad, but this second batch sucked- the sticky stuff pulled away from the felt.

    And, I’ll never bolt in my speakers again. This build I’m pulling drivers from two prior builds and don’t know how I got the bolts on in the first place - kinda tight in the corners. Going with wood screws going forward- easy enough to add a bit more wood at the back of the baffle where the drivers will screw in (glue and a couple of pins) and, I think wood screws hold better.

    6thplanetSteve_LeeGowa
  • edited July 1

    Hey Grok 3…submitted a question.

    Response (trimmed down)
    To determine the f3 and f6 for the described system using two Dayton Audio RSS210HO-8 8-inch subwoofer drivers in a sealed enclosure, I’ll analyze the setup based on the provided parameters, driver specifications, and acoustic principles. I’ll calculate the response for both the un-EQ’d case and with a broad 3 dB boost at 35 Hz.

    System Overview
    - Drivers: Two Dayton Audio RSS210HO-8 (8-ohm) subwoofers, wired in parallel (resulting in a 4-ohm nominal load).
    - Enclosure: Sealed, net volume of 0.70 cu ft (19.8 liters).
    - Driver Placement:
    - Front driver: Mounted high on the front baffle.
    - Rear driver: Mounted low on the back baffle, with a 4.0 mH inductor creating a low-pass filter.

    Parallel Wiring:
    - Two 8-ohm drivers in parallel yield a 4-ohm nominal load.
    - Combined sensitivity increases by ~6 dB (3 dB from doubled cone area, 3 dB from halved impedance), so ~90.5 dB

    Driver Placement
    - Front (High) and Rear (Low): The front driver high on the baffle and rear driver low on the back creates a pseudo-bipolar radiation pattern. At low frequencies (<100 Hz), where wavelengths are long (e.g., 11.3 ft at 100 Hz), the placement has minimal impact on f3 or f6, as the sound is omnidirectional. The rear driver’s output reinforces the front driver’s in the bass region, maintaining the calculated response.

    Effect of EQ
    - For a Qtc ≈ 0.7 system, a broad boost can lower f3 by approximately 10-20% (depending on Q and boost bandwidth), as it counteracts the natural roll-off.

    Using simulation approximations (e.g., WinISD or BassBox Pro for sealed systems with EQ):

    • f3 with EQ: The boost flattens the response around 35 Hz, lowering f3 to ~40-45 Hz. Assuming a broad Q ≈ 1.5, f3 ≈ 42 Hz is reasonable.
    • f6 with EQ: The f6 point shifts lower, to ~30-32 Hz, as the boost extends the roll-off point further.
    • Room Gain: In a room, low-frequency response may be enhanced by boundary reinforcement, potentially lowering perceived f3/f6 by 5-10

    We’ll see how this pans out…

  • edited July 2

    Following up with another Grok inquiry regarding recommendations for selecting best LP filter for implementation of broad ranger with woofer (considering HP active/passive implementations).

    Summary

    High-Pass Filter for Broad-Range Driver:

    • Active 4th-order LR high-pass at 80 Hz (phase: ~0° at 380 Hz, +180° at 80 Hz).

    • Passive 0.011 µF capacitor line level (~380 Hz, 1st-order, phase: +45° at 380 Hz).

    • Total phase at 380 Hz: +45°.

    Recommended Woofer Filter:

    • Active 3rd-order low-pass filter at 380 Hz (phase: -135° at 380 Hz).

    • Invert woofer polarity to align phases (180° difference → 0°), ensuring flat summation.

    Phase Issues:

    • The 180° phase difference at 380 Hz is corrected by polarity inversion.

    • The 80 Hz LR filter has minimal impact at 380 Hz, and the 80–380 Hz region should have reasonable phase coherence due to the woofer’s low-pass filter approaching 0° phase at low frequencies.

  • edited July 3

    I’m a fan of minwax polycrylic ultraflat. Water based, goes on easily with foam brushes (I’m not set up for spray finishes), and drys fairly quickly for follow-up coats. Hard to see in pic, but the finish is fairly flat - a slight sheen. The stain was black oil based (no pre-stain applied on Baltic Birch, and let dry for 4 days) leaving some grain to show through- I’d call it somewhere between dark brown and black (should ~match our floors).

    kenrhodes6thplanet
  • Nice grain for Birch.

Sign In or Register to comment.